Waterproof Shockproof Digital Camera News and Information on Waterproof Shockproof Digital Cameras

1. 

   trainz675
   June 21st, 2010 - 08:31

   i like canon a LOT better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2. 

   thebutler89
   June 21st, 2010 - 08:57

   the difference in picture quality is really evident if you watch the cows running in both videos
3. 

   TheMovieMaker2
   June 21st, 2010 - 09:04

   at the time it was a decent camera but im getting another one soon mines just broke and i’ve sent it to cannon. Hopefully they will replace it so its new and then i can sell it for a decent price the zoom on this camera is great so don’t doubt it!
4. 

   ICESTORG
   June 21st, 2010 - 09:23

   I liked both of them, but the Canon ruled the day.. Thanks for sharing..
5. 

   maple2609
   June 21st, 2010 - 10:21

   Had the canon FS200 and returned it the next day. They both suck in picture quality. I got a kodak zi8 which shoots 720p and 1080p 60fps HD, and half the price. Standard def is out people, get with HD. I couldnt be happier with the Zi8, it is the top HD camera in its class and rivals most thousand dollar HD cameras aswell.
6. 

   gtarbmx
   June 21st, 2010 - 10:31

   canon always wins. and miniDV is outdated by far
7. 

   pbyolo56
   June 21st, 2010 - 11:27

   i just got the fs100
   thats my vote
8. 

   probacont2007
   June 21st, 2010 - 11:28

   The video quality sucks for both. Colors are washed out! Missing the clarity
9. 

   dayboyy24
   June 21st, 2010 - 12:06

   wow why did you sell the canon? it looks so much better and sounds better
10. 

    seansoddworld
    June 21st, 2010 - 12:28

    damn euro steamers. so clackety.
11. 

    jiffyman
    June 21st, 2010 - 13:16

    I dont know how you can sat different positions, both cmareas were sat touching each other on one gate post…. Lol
12. 

    andreilucaci81
    June 21st, 2010 - 13:28

    1-you captured from diferent positions..
    2-the sound on Sony is better..
13. 

    jiffyman
    June 21st, 2010 - 13:33

    I went for the Sony SR290E in the end, another HDD camera
14. 

    synthplaya
    June 21st, 2010 - 13:35

    should have kept the canon. i hate those tapes! the canon picture was much better but the sound was about the same.
15. 

    Robotdrummerzzk
    June 21st, 2010 - 14:05

    Canon has better picture, the Sony one is more grainy and less defined. You should have stuck with Canon
16. 

    stevenerer
    June 21st, 2010 - 14:29

    You have badly set up of canon camcoder, read the user guide and than screen won’t be choppy.
17. 

    ro7477
    June 21st, 2010 - 15:27

    here is what you do – open this video up in two windows. one you play from the start and in the other window cue the clip from where the cannon starts up… and then -you can see the difference.

    actually i did have the sony hc27 for two years, it was brilliant. very sturdy and reliable….but i just got my cannon and it kicks serious arse!! i was always a fan of miniDVs but now SD cards rule ..cheers
18. 

    PsychoNinjaFreak
    June 21st, 2010 - 16:12

    Canon has better resolution and sound
19. 

    NorfolkWestern34
    June 21st, 2010 - 16:31

    Canon is so much better
20. 

    ThatEmoMonkey
    June 21st, 2010 - 17:23

    the colours are so much more refined on the canon, lots of definition between objects aswell
21. 

    Molex350
    June 21st, 2010 - 17:38

    but miniDV are less reliable… because of vibrations etc. (for example on motorbike the SD recording is much better…)
22. 

    schaanman
    June 21st, 2010 - 18:08

    um thats why i came to this address. to learn not to teach.. lol

    i have both the canon fs100 and the sony dcr-hc36 i welded a mount to the front of my bumper for rock crawling footage. ill compare this summer and see the difference, but from the vid i think vid quality of sony better but sound better on canon.
23. 

    mbv1364
    June 21st, 2010 - 18:46

    You can feel the movement of sound in the sony, BUT the picture of canon is better.
24. 

    icollided
    June 21st, 2010 - 19:13

    flash memory wins
25. 

    OmegaBlueWind74
    June 21st, 2010 - 19:57

    Don’t you think that this comparison is a little unfair jiffyman? I mean, you are comparing a Sony MiniDV camcorder and a Canon flash memory camcorder. Both of the camcorders should of been MiniDV or flash memory.

    I will say that the Canon camcorder has better image and sound quality than the Sony camcorder. I like both Sony and Canon camcorders.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.